|
by Brian Dugas
I was recently contacted by Lizz Parsons who is with the organization called CADBI, The Coalition to Abolish Death by Incarceration (CADBI) . Their organization is planning a state wide caravan that will start in Pittsburgh and pass through the Wilkes Barre area. On Wednesday, September 24th at 6:00PM they will be using our church as their meeting place on their caravan, and they hope to draw people from around the region for a discussion and viewing the short documentary of The Man Who Came Home which traces the story of a young Puerto Rican immigrant, Francisco Mojica, finding his way on the streets of Kensington, through three decades in prison, to a devout family man caring for his wife as they age. Mojica’s story captures the cruelty of DBI sentences and highlights the human cost of mass incarceration. Attendees will meet leaders of the movement to end DBI, engage in discussion about the issue, and learn how to get involved in our movement. When you become a part of our movement you access the knowledge of our collective experiences, resources and emotional support. Feel free to call Lizz at 570-417-1126 with questions about the event. Attendees are invited to bring a photo or object for the altar of remembrance, honoring those lost to violence. And since we have mentioned immigration, I want to remind you of the Peace and Justice Centers Annual Gathering/Awards Luncheon on Sunday, September, 21st at 2:00PM at the Apple Tree Terrace, Newberry Estates in Dallas. This year we will be honoring some of the unsung heroes from the Latino population of Wilkes Barre who work behind the scenes to help others in need. Father Fidel from St. Nicks/St Mary’s Parish will be recognized for his unwavering support of the Latino community. If you would like any additional information on either of these events please speak to me (or Lizz if she is here). Information can be found in the announcements and on the Facebook page, which you should join if you are able.
0 Comments
by Troy Van Denover
In a research paper by Gregmar I. Galinato, WSU Pullman and Ryne Rohla, now working for the Office of the Attorney General Washington State Private prisons proliferated in the U.S. since the mid-1980s. In 1984, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA, now CoreCivic) established the first privately-owned and -operated incarceration facility in Hamilton County, Tennessee (Mattera et al., 2001). The private prison industry experienced substantial growth through the late-1980s and early-1990s where annual industry revenues rose from $14 million in 1984 to $120 million in 1994 (Mattera et al., 2001). The capacity of private incarceration facilities increased from 3000 beds in 1984 to 20,000 beds in 1990, followed by annual increases of 50% until 1994 where it slowed to an annual increase of 25% for the latter half of the decade (Mattera et al., 2001).2 One hypothesis raised concerns the impact of private prisons on incarceration rates in the U.S., which is highest in the world (Walmsley, 2018). The American Civil Liberties Union asserts private prisons significantly increased the incarceration rate in the U.S. since the mid-1980s (Shapiro, 2011). Stringent crime laws along with the private prisons may have contributed to the rise in incarceration rates. For example, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ("1994 Crime Bill") increased funding for law enforcement and expanded punishments for a variety of offenses including weapons crimes, immigration violations, hate crimes, sex crimes, and gang-related crime. Such laws can facilitate underlying mechanisms which causally relate the increase in private prisons to incarceration rates. One potential mechanism is through lobbying and direct contributions to politicians and officials in exchange for favorable policies which increase incarceration rates (Ashton and Petteruti, 2011). Two prominent examples illustrate the plausibility of this mechanism. First, in the “Kids for Cash” scandal in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, two judges received money from two private juvenile detention centers in exchange for harsh judgements on juvenile offenders to increase the number of residents in the centers (May, 2014). The judges sentenced minors convicted of misdemeanors to internment in private youth correctional facilities in exchange for $2.6 million in kickbacks. Second, lobby groups for private prisons supported California's three-strikes rule and Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law for harsher penalties on crimes and longer sentences (Cohen, 2015). CoreCivic lobbied for increased appropriation measures from the Office of Federal Detention Trustee and for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to maintain or increase the “bed quota,” a policy mandating a minimum of 34,000 inmates at any given time regardless of illegal immigration levels (Ashton and Petteruti, 2011). Another mechanism is overcrowding in public prisons (Wilson, 2014), which might dissuade judges from assigning marginal convicts to prison. Private prisons may reduce this capacity constraint, leading to more incarcerations. The role of these mechanisms remains unstudied. There is also gap in the literature in understanding the channels by which private prisons influence incarceration levels such as incentivizing arrest rates leading to more trials, influencing guilty verdicts, or changing the individual likelihood of incarceration over probation. Scot Weybright, Washington State University Today Current U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi was previously a paid lobbyist for Ballard Partners who represented wealthy special interests including The GEO Group, a private prison company that has faced criticism for safety violations, providing inadequate health care, and poor management practices. according to the U.S. Senate Committee of the Judiciary. The GEO Group looks to rake in upwards of billions of dollars with the increased incarceration of those unlawfully detained by ICE and the current rounding up of the homeless and mentally ill. What You Can Do A Pennsylvania lawmaker is proposing legislation to prohibit state and local contracts with private prison facilities and corporations in Pennsylvania. State Representative Perry Warren (D-31) says he intends to introduce legislation to prohibit private prisons in Pennsylvania, highlighting a range of issues associated with them. Rep. Warren argues that criminal justice is the responsibility of the U.S. government, not for-profit private entities. The memo says that 99,754 individuals were incarcerated in privately owned prisons in the U.S. in 2020, according to the Sentencing Project. He added that private prisons have a history and are often associated with questionable behavior and poor service when compared to state-run facilities. According to the Office of Justice Programs, private prisons are often accused of prioritizing profit over inmate well-being, which can lead to increased violence, understaffing, poorly maintained facilities, and other issues. The memo claims that private prison companies have little incentive to rehabilitate inmates. “While we cannot change federal law, we must take action as a state to end the privatization of corrections, prisons and immigrant detention centers at the state and local level. There is no acceptable reason for private entities to be in charge of the custody, care and rehabilitation of any incarcerated individual,” the memo says. The bill has not yet been submitted for introduction. Please contact your state representatives to urge them to support State Representative Perry Warren in submitting this bill and getting it passed in Pennsylvania. We can lead the way locally and affect the national policy in the coming year. by Jennifer John
Human trafficking is a topic I had only a vague understanding of, but I have learned more about it recently. It’s a much bigger and more complicated problem than I had realized. You might also be uncertain of what exactly it is. According to the government, “Human trafficking is the exploitation of a person through force, fraud, or coercion for labor, services, or commercial sex. Under U.S. law, causing anyone under 18 to engage in a commercial sex act is trafficking.” The traffickers control their victims in many ways, such as giving them false promises of love or a better life, including fake job offers, making them pay back a debt, threatening them with acts of violence, and/or applying psychological pressure. I had thought part of trafficking involved moving the victims from one place to another, but transportation isn’t required. Human trafficking is about exploitation, not movement. Some people are trafficked in their own hometown. (1) Who is at risk for human trafficking? According to the Polaris Project National Survivor Study, “Prior to their trafficking, survivors reported experiencing other vulnerabilities at alarmingly high rates.
Another disturbing statistic from The Counter-Trafficking Data Collaborative is that globally, 25% of human trafficking victims are children. Among these individuals:
According to The Community Policing Dispatch website, the following groups are at a higher risk of becoming a victim.
Who are the traffickers? What are their demographics? From the Bureau of Justice Statistics Human Trafficking Data Collection Activities, 2024, “Of the 1,070 defendants charged with any of the three types of human trafficking offenses in U.S. district court in fiscal year 2022, 91% were male, 58% were white, 20% were black, 18% were Hispanic, 95% were U.S. citizens, and 71% had no prior convictions.” (5) During this research, I found an article in the Times Leader from January 11, 2025. It’s an article called “Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Region Designated a ‘Hot Spot’ for Human Trafficking.” The author of the article had interviewed Tammi Burke, chief program officer at the Victims Resource Center, and Mackenzie Jennings, the agency’s human trafficking advocate. The team at the Victims Resource Center works every day to identify survivors and connect them to safety and support. From 2023 to 2024, the number of identified victims in their care jumped by nearly 50%, and new cases are coming in daily. Sex trafficking is a multi-billion-dollar industry, and traffickers are in it for the money. Unlike drugs or guns, a victim can be sold repeatedly. Traffickers sometimes push victims into crimes like theft, prostitution, or drug possession — crimes committed under threat, which often lead to the victim’s arrest while the trafficker remains free. Reporting trafficking is complex. Many victims don’t see themselves as victims — some develop a trauma bond with their trafficker, while others fear the police, blame themselves, or have been told their families will be hurt if they try to escape. These layers of fear, manipulation, and dependency are exactly why awareness matters so much. By learning the signs and speaking up, communities can play a powerful role in helping survivors break free and begin to heal. Nationally, Pennsylvania ranks ninth in the number of human trafficking cases reported. There are several hotspots in Pennsylvania. Ranked in the top 10 are Wilkes-Barre, Scranton, the Poconos, and Bloomsburg. I was shocked to learn that traffickers can make as much as $125,000 per victim per year. Jennings and Burke said later in the article, “Many traffickers work together — they have their own victims, but also sell victims to one another. Traffickers throughout Luzerne County could have 2 victims or as many as 20.” Right now, Luzerne County has no safe shelter for survivors. Learn the signs. Speak up. You could save someone’s life. If you suspect trafficking, call the National Human Trafficking Hotline: 1-888-373-7888 or text “HELP” to 233733. (6) In the additional resources below is a three-minute YouTube video you might want to check out from the “Alliance to End Human Trafficking.” References:
Additional resources: by Brian Dugas
On 6/1 I spoke about our potential camping trip and a possible opportunity to connect to the Latino community. I will give you an update on both of them. On 6/9 the Community Justice Alliance met at Kings College with members from the Latino community and other concerned participants who would like to find ways to support them. There were more than 20 people in attendance and we shared a lot of information with each others:
We decided that these meetings would be beneficial in Luzerne County and are planning the same meeting down here in the near future. Date confidential, in Spanish, those willing to come could be liaison/supporters. The Villanova Interdisciplinary Immigration Studies Training for Advocates: VIISTA is a 100% online course that trains students to become immigrant advocates ready to serve migrants and refugees. Unlike criminal proceedings, migrants are not entitled to court appointed lawyers so 6 out of 10 migrants confront the immigration system without a lawyer, and many of these are children. Students who earn a VIISTA certificate can apply to become a Department of Justice accredited representative and can provide low-cost legal representation when they work for a DOJ recognized organization (Catholic Social Services, Church World Services). The training encompasses all aspects of working with migrant families and can be used for employment or volunteer purposes. There are costs associated to the training but there are scholarships available. We are trying to get a cohort for the fall class, and we need 5 people to do that. We already have several people who have committed. 3 Modules $685 for one, $1,370 for two, $4,110 for three. Don't forget the Camping Trip - 8/23 -8/24 by Jennifer John
It was a whole decade ago, and is still cause for celebration. On June 26th, it will be the tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that made marriage equality possible, granting same-sex couples the right to full, equal recognition under the law in all 50 states. June 26, 2015, was both a long time ago and somehow doesn’t seem that far away. I have to remember, though, that for people under age 20, like my children, it was about half a lifetime or more ago. Marriage equality is worth celebrating and worth fighting to keep. Since we had marriage equality in Pennsylvania for about a year before that Supreme Court decision, I hadn’t realized that our state is still lacking in providing other basic rights to its LGBTQ+ citizens. While searching for information for this social action minute, I found out about “The Fairness Act” here in Pennsylvania. I had not known that legislation like this had never become law here. Pennsylvania is the only northeastern state without an LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination law. On the PA House Democrats website, there is a news release from June 3, earlier this month. “As Pride Month begins, state lawmakers in the Pennsylvania LGBTQ+ Equality Caucus...announced the reintroduction of the Fairness Act at a state Capitol news conference. The PA Fairness Act (H.B. 300) would amend the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to include ‘sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression’ to the current list of prohibited types of discrimination.” The Pennsylvania Human Relations Act guides the state’s Human Relations Commission, which handles discrimination complaints in housing, jobs, and public services, with the authority to issue fines and refer cases to court. A related bill passed the state House in 2023–24, but stalled in the Senate State Government Committee and never reached a vote. Let’s encourage our state Representatives and Senators to work to fix this injustice. Please contact them to vote for “The PA Fairness Act” (H.B. 300) because LGBTQ+ individuals should be guaranteed the same rights and safeguards in housing, the workplace, and public spaces as any other person in Pennsylvania. For more information, please see:
by Lilly Gioia
As a congregation we all know our federal tax exempt status could be lost if we publicly endorse a political candidate. We purposely refrain from doing that because of the JOHNSON AMENDMENT, a law prohibiting any non-profit organization 501(c) (3) from endorsing OR opposing political candidates. Organizations that provide charitable or socially beneficial services to the community pay NO TAXES and raise funds through tax-deductible donations. Political activities are blatantly inconsistent with those community service goals. If churches are allowed to become political arms of one party or another, the political contributions would effectively become TAX DEDUCTIBLE and less trans- parent than current law allows. The Johnson Amendment is an important barrier to the politicization of non-profits and churches. That’s why HR.2501 & S.1205, the Free Speech Fairness Act is so dangerous. It kills the Johnson Amendment and allows churches to become big piggy banks for tax-deductible political donations. I call this church pollution. If this threat concerns you, do let your Representative and our Senators know what you think! In addition to this tax debacle, there is another very dangerous development. In May The House Ways & Means Committee passed a bill giving the Treasury Secretary power to accuse any non-profit of being a “terrorist supporting organization” without basic due process. Charities that feed the hungry, churches and faith communities, veterans’ groups that care for our heroes, and countless other service providing organizations are at risk today because of this proposed tax bill change. It hands any president’s administration power to label any non-profit as potential enemies of the state if they disagree with the president’s political agenda. Whether it’s an organization providing health care in a disaster, a small rural church, or a local food bank, NO organization is safe if this becomes law. No president should have the power this bill provides to punish political opponents. Over 200 charities, churches and non-profits are protesting this threat to their tax status should a Treasury Secretary designate them with NO DUE PROCESS as a terrorist supporting organization. Section 112209 on page 390 of HR.9495 gives the Treasury Secretary the ability to accuse any nonprofit organization of being “terrorist supporting” which would then trigger a process that jeopardizes their tax exempt status, risks them being de-banked, and can result in long term reputational impacts. Among the 200+ groups already objecting to being designated a terrorist threat are the AFL-CIO, the American Library Association, the Sierra Club, the Committee to Protect Journalists, Pax Christi USA, Indivisible, the League of Women Voters, Evangelicals for Democracy, the Interfaith Alliance, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the American Public Health Association, Action Together NEPA, Muslim Public Affairs Council and the American Federation of Teachers. In case you didn’t think churches and public service groups were targets of Project 2025 supporters, think again. by Lindsay Riddell
On Tuesday, Governor Josh Shapiro announced that his Administration has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for unlawfully terminating Pennsylvania’s Local Food Purchasing Assistance (LFPA) Program agreement — a $13 million commitment that directly supports 189 Pennsylvania farms and supplies 14 food banks with fresh, locally grown food. The Shapiro Administration tried to appeal the USDA’s unlawful termination of the LFPA25 agreement, filing an administrative appeal through the USDA, reaching out to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, and even traveling to Washington, D.C. to meet with USDA leadership. Despite those efforts, the USDA ignored Pennsylvania’s requests to support farmers across the Commonwealth. Since 2022, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) has administered more than $28 million in federal LFPA funding, helping food banks reduce waste, distribute local produce, and strengthen the state’s food system. The most recent three-year contract, signed in December 2024, was abruptly canceled in March 2025 — without Explanation. Despite multiple appeals and direct outreach, USDA officials failed to provide any justification or engage in the formal appeals process. On May 7th, USDA officially terminated the agreement. In public statements, USDA officials falsely claimed Pennsylvania was “sitting on tens of millions” in unspent LFPA funds — despite the fact that the program operates on a reimbursement basis. PDA pays vendors up front and is reimbursed by the federal government once expenses are incurred. “The USDA’s decision was not just unexpected — it was unlawful, and it has already caused serious harm to Pennsylvania’s agriculture industry,” said Secretary Redding. Pennsylvania is one of the only states in the country that uses LFPA funding exclusively to support in-state farmers — ensuring every federal dollar stays local and directly supports Pennsylvania’s agricultural economy. With food banks experiencing record-high demand and agricultural producers facing the toughest market conditions in decades, the USDA’s action is not only unjustified — it’s deeply harmful to working families and farming communities. Local Farmers Markets are opening as early as next weekend. Check out VisitLuzerneCounty.com for days and times, and if you are able, please go and support our local farmers. by Brian Dugas
Sorry, I’m going to get real for a few minutes:
I realize that I don’t have to tell many of you this depressing news, we see and hear it on a daily basis—--- unless you are lucky enough to be able to turn it all off and avoid the news and social media - might be a good idea if you can do it. In order to avoid being overwhelmed, I am finding that it is easier to deal with issues that impact me at the local level rather than focusing on the collapse of an empire. Things like pollution from fracking, corruption of elected officials, loss of support for public schools, and the denial of rights of friends and neighbors are all local issues that I feel I can focus on, and it is at this level that we as a church community can be most effective. If you would like to get involved with any of these issues, please join us on the social action committee or speak to me at any time. Today, I would like to share with you an opportunity to strengthen our community at the same time that we reconnect with nature. Some of you might remember that our original intention with buying this church in the country was to have an environmental theme. The efforts of the Green Team and those congregation members and friends who supported our projects was exceptional. In addition to those projects we had a wonderful custom of camping each year at a campground in Tunkhannock in order to reconnect with each other and nature. Over the last few years we have had some success with reinvigorating this nature experience. This year, many of us feel that we need to reconnect and build community more than ever. Our planning team has met and begun organizing the events and logistics for our camping trip on August 23 and 24 at Bear Creek Camp. This is a Saturday and Sunday with the service being held on Sunday, August 24th in the woods of Bear Creek. There are events and activities planned for both Saturday and Sunday. There are: Cabins, tent space, a kitchen, an in-door bathroom and showers, a fire pit, and a playground right next to our site. There are costs for the cabins and tents, but assistance and support is available to those in need. The bottom line is that we want everyone to be able to participate, so if there is a way we can help, let us know. Please sign up using the online questionnaire in the announcements, or in person here in the church so we know how many people are coming and what their preferences are. And for those of you willing and able to get involved with an important issue facing many people in our country and recently in our own communities, we are working with other organizations to organize a meeting between concerned community members, legal experts, and leaders from the Latino community. Our initial intentions are to meet and discuss how we can make personal connections and find ways to support the Latino community in this region. The meeting is on Monday, June 9th at 5:30PM at King’s College. Please see me for any additional information or questions. This is a closed meeting, by invitation only for obvious reasons, but consider yourselves to be invited. Thank you. by Beth Black
Public housing in the U.S. refers to rental housing that is owned and managed by local Public Housing Agencies (PHAs). These PHAs are funded and regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Public housing provides affordable rental homes to low-income individuals, families, seniors, and people with disabilities. Public housing comes in all sizes and types, from scattered single-family houses to high rise apartments for elderly families. There are approximately 1.6 million Americans living in public housing units, managed by some 3,300 HAs. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers Federal aid to local housing agencies (HAs) that manage the housing for low-income residents at rents they can afford. Rent is based on 30% of adjusted gross income, minus a utility allowance if applicable. One of the advantages of Public Housing is that since your rent is based on your income, if your income goes down due to job loss or other circumstances, your rent is adjusted downward to reflect your lower income. I work for the Luzerne County Housing Authority. The Luzerne County Housing Authority operates 22 federally funded housing projects throughout Luzerne County. The program includes 1,352 units in sizes ranging from efficiency to five bedroom apartments. In addition to Federal projects, the Housing Authority also owns and operates Horizon Village and Wright Manor in Mountaintop. As well as affordable private rentals scattered through out the county. Public housing is limited to low-income families and individuals. An HA determines your eligibility based on: 1) annual gross income; 2) whether you qualify as elderly, a person with a disability, or as a family; and 3) U.S. citizenship or eligible immigration status. If you are eligible, the HA will check your references to make sure you and your family will be good tenants. HAs will deny admission to any applicant whose habits and practices may be expected to have a detrimental effect on other tenants or on the project’s environment. Our Housing Authority gives a preference to Veterans and Luzerne County residents. HAs use income limits developed by HUD. HUD sets the lower income limits at 80% and very low-income limits at 50% of the median income for the county or metropolitan area in which you choose to live. Income limits vary from area to area so you may be eligible at one HA but not at another. Luzerne County Housing Authority uses the low income limits, which range from $46,900 for a single individual to $88,400 for a family of 8. Public Housing differs from the Section 8 program, which issues vouchers that can be used to rent apartments from private landlords. Eligibility and rent calculations are the same, but the Housing Authority reimburses the landlord for the difference between the calculated 30% rent and the fair market rent for the apartment. An additional 3 million Americans rent residences in Section 8. The Trump Administration released their FY 2026 skinny budget proposal. Although the president’s budget is a political document and does not have the force of law, it does propose devastating cuts to housing and community development programs. The budget proposes the creation of a State Rental Assistance Block Grant, which would block grant funding for Public Housing, Section 8 Tenant-Based and Project-Based Rental Assistance, Housing for the Elderly, and Housing for Persons with Disabilities to the states – and cut these programs by an overall $26.718 billion (43%). The budget would also institute a two-year cap on rental assistance for able bodied adults. These cuts would have a devastating impact on millions of families across the country and block granting funding would make it easier for Congress to cut rental-assistance in the future. The administration has proposed eliminating the Section 8 program completely in the future. The average cost of a one bedroom apartment in Pennsylvania is $942.00 and the poverty rate in Luzerne County stands at 15.4%. The waitlist for Section 8 is closed and the waitlist for Public Housing can be several years. Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) are vital to communities nationwide, effectively managing resources to support vulnerable residents and uphold local accountability. They reduce homelessness, stabilize families, create jobs, and lead community development that enhances neighborhood safety and livability. By providing direct rental assistance, PHAs enable low- to middle-income families to afford housing near their workplaces, driving positive economic outcomes in communities of all sizes. The proposals in the President’s budget would have devastating impacts on communities across the country. by Brian Dugas
Today I’m going to speak about the issue of immigration. I am currently involved with an organization that is seeking to work on local immigration issues. I will share information about that organization and how you can get involved at the end of this social action minute. I have to admit that in the short time that I have been working on the issue I have learned a lot about the needs and issues of the local Latino community. There is a lot that many of us do not know. I think it is time that we all start learning. Most of us understand that we are actually a nation of immigrants. Many of us trace our heritage back to a foreign land. The only true inhabitants of these lands are the Native Americans whose population was thoroughly decimated by those foreign immigrants, also known as our ancestors. Throughout American history we have blamed and scapegoated one immigrant population after another for the problems of our society, when in fact it was the society itself that is toxic. I think that the only positive thing that can be said about these difficult times that we are now facing is that many of us have had the blindfolds torn off, and we have had to face the true causes of our prejudice and misogyny. You can’t even begin the process of healing until you recognize the real issues. Just a few facts about immigrants in America:
Because of this, numerous concerned individuals and organizations have decided to come together to try and find a way to help. We have formed an organization called the Community Justice Alliance. It is made up of NEPA residents who have an interest in supporting the Latino population in the Wyoming Valley. We have had multiple meetings and sponsored a Sabol Lecture at Kings College where local and regional attorneys shared their concerns and recommendations. This group has continued to meet and expand and has decided to make it a goal to support and uplift the local Latino population. This is being accomplished through two main efforts: one is developing closer ties to the Latino community through informal community gatherings, and the second is to provide legal support and access to social services to those in need. Both of these efforts are being done through partnerships with local organizations that already support extensive Latino populations. I have learned:
Because of my involvement in this group, I have had the opportunity to learn a lot more about the legal issues associated with our immigration laws, and the obstacles it provides for immigrants just trying to follow the rules and do what’s right. At our next meeting we will have one of the few immigration attorneys operating in this area with us talking about ways that we can better support the Latino population. This may include creating a group of trained advocates who can serve as a point of contact for those in need. Please join us to learn more. |
The Social Action Minute
One of the most popular features of our Sunday services is our Social Action Minute. During this time, a member of the Social Action Committee speaks on a topic of their choice in order to bring awareness and a call to action to the members of our Congregation. These are the archives of the Social Action Minutes presented at our Sunday services. If you missed a service, or are interested in the topic, you can revisit it and get information here. Archives
March 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed